Kants Ethics vs Utilitarianism Essay

The two pith ethical theories covered in class that I started to assess atomic function 18 the categorical imperative and utilitarianism, twain of which offer an approach to decision do in the context of social and inter soulfulnessal relationships. In this with in erudition understanding of both that Kantian ethical motive is much easily apprehended than the ethics of utilitarianism as Kantian ethics apply to eitherone yet both ethical approaches triad to faults. Utilitarianism is the moral opening that brings upon the greatest cheer.This theory illustrates that in force(p) actions as said to be right as they endorse happiness to psyche or a group of people whereas wrong as they uphold unhappiness. Kantian ethics on the other(a) hand puts a persons benefit before the greater veracious, that is people never should be use as center only but means to an end. Both Kants ethics and Utilitarianism greatly analogize between each other as Kant is deontological which means th at someone ought to do things because they argon right, as it is concern and that in itself adjudges it right.On the other hand Utilitarianism is based on consequence as someone should act to bring the greatest good to the greatest number of people. Utilitarianism does not care if the greatest good/benefit is brought with someones manipulation, lies or coercion. Kants ethical would disagree with this completely as If someone lies then it becomes universal law that everyone would have the right to do the like thing.Ethical implication arise from Kants ethics even up if this in my opinion is a more logical means that a person should consider in ethical decision making. Suppose for workout you would have your friends for telling the truth in a given property, Kants ethics says you shouldnt lie what so ever because it is you duty not to do so would bring unhappiness and here utilitarianism would differ completely.Another office staff where Kants ethics would coincide with itself is for example if a woman was act to hide from a guy that was trying to kill her and you decided to tending that woman by letting her stay in your house, few hours afterwards the guy trying to kill that woman come knocking on your door asking about her whereabouts. Here with Kants ethics you open firet lie as it is your duty not to and it is also your duty to protect that woman you made a promise to earlier, in this situation one action must be chosen and this shows a major(ip) fault in Kants ethics.Utilitarianism has its benefits but requires much more campaign to do than Kants ethics. There are two classical types of utilitarianism, which are act and rule utilitarianism. Act utilitarianism is right only if the result of good is just as much or more than any other available alternating(a). Rule utilitarianism states that an act is right if the rule itself acceptance would lead to a greater utility for society that any other substitute then that act is right.The strength of u tilitarianism comes in the fact of it offering a system that is absolute, giving us a potential solution to every situation faced. The second strength is that is seems to grasp the sense of morality even though the actions are come with deceitful like lying means it is for the greater good, uplifting the suffering in this world. Utilitarianism has its objections and can be gnarly as different people have different thought on what happiness is and what pleasure is.One of the problems that arise from Utilitarianism is the no rest objection, for example if I wanted to sleep or go to the movies at those moments I could be trying to help poor people or conservation the environment to promote more utility. Having my salary should mostly go into help others as this brings upon the greatest good but as you see this theory does not make sense to why I shouldnt make myself happy. Trying to help all the time with no rest becomes alike demanding and this theory fails understand different ob ligations making utilitarianism a false ism to many.