Relationship between Neoclassicism and Romanticism; Realism and Essay

kindred between Neoclassicism and Romanticism reality and Impressionism - Essay ExampleFrom the enquiry it can be comprehended that Neoclassicism was a revival of the classic art that was prevalent during the measure of the past Greek and Rome. It developed as a response to the heavily decorative flare of Rococo and indeed favored simple lines and order. The curvy style of Rococo was replaced by simple clean lines. Neoclassicism, since it was also elysian by the Renaissance art, laid emphasis on cause and logic. Romanticism, on the other hand, was an intellectual strawman that sprang up during the late 18th century. It developed as a response to the Industrial Revolution and therefrom was against the scientific rationalization and in general contradicted with the Age of Enlightenment. Emotion, rather than logic, was stressed in this particular style with emphasis on emotions such as terror, awe and horror. Artists from the era of Romanticism were against the forms developed by the classic artists. They were not inspired by the beauty of the perfect subjects that the neoclassic artists painted. Rather they criticized the neoclassicism art for being hokey and without any real emotions. Since Neoclassicism was inspired by the Ancient Greeks and Roman whose main subjects were beau ideals, it was obvious that the subjects of neoclassic artists were God like human beings with little or no emotion in their eyes or eubstance language. In their use of colors, the Romantic art was quite contrary with that of the neoclassic art. Romantic artists used vivacious colors, inspired from the Middle East artists while their earlier peers depended on muted colors. Romanticism can be defined as a dynamic art form with its vibrant use of colors and emotions. Neoclassicism, on the other hand, is a passive art form that uses muted colors and shows no emotion. Emotion and rationality are two ends of a spectrum and the relationship between Romanticism and Neoclassicism c an be understood by the fact that Romanticism represented emotion while Neoclassicism relied on logic. If Neoclassicism was God centric, Romanticism was human centric. Relationship between realness and Impressionism Realism is a French art movement that began in the 1850s in the issue of the 1848 revolution. Realism was an art form that was developed as a reaction towards the Romantic art form. Realism arts denied the use of excessive emotion in their art and aimed to develop objective reality in their art forms. Depicting the painting in its real and true form was the aim of realist artists. This was a time when photography was gaining popularity and photography provided support to realism with its natural and true depiction of the subject. Impressionism, on the other hand, was a 19th century movement that was developed by Paris artists who defied the norms by using free dust strokes to create realism. They explored different places of the scene and inculcated movement in art. These artists were first not taken seriously hardly with time, they art style spread to other parts of the art world. It is believed that it was the great artist, Manet who created the transition between Realism and Impressionism. Manet went away with the use of painting layers in his painting so that he could create his painting in one sitting with the model present. This meant that he could not make any mistake with the use of the colors, thence the art form was a fast art form that did not receive a affirmatory reception in the beginning. Realism art was an art that tried to tune in to the norms of the art society. impressionistic art form, however, created a revolution in the art society as it redefined the term art. Impressionist artists demanded solely shows while French artists vehemently opposed them. However, with time people realized that Impressionism had brought a fresh perspective in art and they accepted the art form. One