Was Parliament Justified In Killing the King? :: essays research papers

Despite the simplistic fact that queen mole rat Charles I was the legally rectitudeful leader of England, Parliament was more than reassert in executing Charles I due to the divergent and passionate views of law and life between the throng and the big businessman in politics, society, and religion. Parliament neer desired a position where they could control England with full-f conductged power. They simply precious enough limitations on the indexs power that would guarantee the people certain rights that the mightiness cannot take away, which juxtaposes the belief of divine right. Parliament attempt and true numerous ways to create a structured administration where the kings power was restricted and Parliament, including the people that they represented, was given a persona in government but their countless tries were futile and a disappointment. forward the Civil War and many times after it, Parliament tried to approach the king to present to him their ideas of how powe r should be distributed and used. They came up with laws and regulations to make up ones mind political problems with the king, such as the Petition of Rights, Nineteen Propositions, and Grand Remonstrance. The king declined to acknowledge these laws as genuine laws. He either signed and ignore it or he absolutely refused to bother himself with the minor complaints of Parliament. This eventually led to the conclusion that King Charles I was the type of man who could not be trusted with the legal promises he made to his people. The worries of Parliament were not seen as a major concern of his and he repudiated to consider any negotiations with some(prenominal) Parliament had to say. The kings intractable ways caused Parliament to stop away from his power before England became a place of political disaster. Although the resolved king refused to recognize Parliaments authorized power and influence, he turned his back on his Protestant country to form hostile alliances against his own people. If that wasnt ghastly enough, the king acted in an outrageous and fearful way when he put religion into the conflict and made it worse. He asked for military assistance from the Catholic pope and agreed to certain cost that could have shattered his already-destabilized country. The king denied the fact that he had been defeated by his own subjects, and he did anything he could do in his power to clog the loss of his throne. It is not right of a true and legitimate king to overlook his people and betray them in such a horrendous and unthinkable way as to destroy the pride of his countrys religion.