Sunday, February 3, 2019
Globalization and Anthropology :: Outsourcing, Offshoring, Free Trade
1. We live in a world where nothing is sacred if commercializeing it can make a buck. Be it tourist indigenous memorabilia or your own extra kidney, you can bet theres a viable market, and someones willing to buy. Given the fantastic larceny of international transactions, orbicularized markets evoke particularly ominous possibilities for the marginalized in our capitalistic economy. Exposing hide out global issues from tourist art to bio-piracy, Schneider and Scheper-Hughes complicate our find outing of globalization by questioning ones responsibility to the agency of others in an more and more interrelated world. According to Schneider, defining authenticity is a battle surrounded by indigenous peoples and the tourists who purchase their arts and crafts. As tourist art grows with the realization of international tourism as means of development and economic ontogenesis in marginalized communities, foreign assumptions affect the perception of indigenous arts and crafts as le gitimately indigenous. Indigenous peoples readily transform functional items into feasible commodities goods such as indigenous blouses and shawls easily become alien place compeer and pillow cases, enabling indigenous peoples to survive (Schneider 80). Schneider asks, does this practice rob peoples of their culture, or simply generate a new kind of survival market culture? In seeking to recognize and question Eurocentric imaginings of the world, the agree of anthropology complicates the right of tourists to judge the commodities of indigenous communities, as it questions the right of a global economy that forces peoples to produce such commodities to survive (Schneider 83).In her more forbidding study of organ theft in impoverished communities, Scheper-Hughes similarly demands that consumers understand the implications of neo-cannibalism on an international scale. Rejecting the idea of impoverished peoples as uneducated and naive informants, Scheper-Hughes questions the meanin g of doctors, organ brokers and prestigious anthropologists denying people voice about body-snatching (35, 39). Her search proves that eviscerated bodies do appear in allies and morgues, and verifies the accounts of poor peoples denied as stainless inventions by authorities (36, 38).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment