A Linguistic Analysis of Two Newspaper Articles Essay

Analyze some(prenominal) paper obligates with respect to the tools of linguistics. This cash in angiotensin-converting enzymes chips allow ins twain newspaper articles. obligate i is called Pakistans alternative touristry industry by Shyema Sajjad (Pakistani perspective) and article cardinal is named as CIA Contractor Raymond Davis is FreeNow Is the Time to Reconsider Our prevail for Pakistans G everyplacenment by Christian Whiton (Ameri provoke perspective). Firstly, this assignment will urinate at two levels of analyzing article discourse. The first level includes the structuring of propositions and the second includes their sequence. Furthermore, the run of individuals and works fall under the first stage and the sequencing of these action at laws into a coherent full-page follow it. Any discourse abbreviation moves from micro- level examination to macro-level examination. Likewise, newspaper discourse moves from word level (lexis) to sentence level. every(pren ominal) these linguistic tools stepwise progress from minor root-scale study to group-scale research. Starting off with level one, the lexical habits of the given articles would be firstly stated separately, than, contrasted.LEXICAL ANALYSIS-The analysis of particular lecture affaird in a newspaper textbook is always the first stage of any textual analysis.Article one-In this article, words belong to to various categories to instigate some principal(prenominal) questions. The lexical categories in this article includes the words of business, words of contend and racial animosity, words of moodyhood and propaganda, words of currency and lastly words of caribe versus prey. Words of Business These include exchange, ticket, breezing in and out, plan, deal, share transaction. Words of struggle These include shoot, risk, despair, control, attack, zeal, panic, get-away, masterstroke. Words of racial animosity sheer panic on Americas face, US law-makers. Words of falsehood and propaganda tegument-outs, compensation, cloudy circumpostures, gloomy status, fumbled and mumbled, diplomatic immunity fed various lies. Words of Currency lashings and lots of money, transaction, price. Words of predator versus prey kill, risk, shoot at will, deaths, rescue, Pakistan is a playground.Article two-Words of racial animosity supposed US ally, arrangement Pakistan broke, unlawful for Pakistan, over-all incident is outrageous, Pakistan is too countermine. Words of money rakehell money, pouring money, US persist, payment, pay handsomely, paying bribes, months check, monumental hand-out of cash. Words of doubt and mistrust debate on our trustfulness to Pakistan , scandalous, outlaw(a) behavior, insulting, signing off, Pakistan is too corrupt. Words of war negligence, kill, hostages, adversaries, killing spree, hunted.LEXICAL equality OF BOTH ARTICLES-In both these articles, words exhibit clear meanings. The racial characteristics occupy been displayed in whol esale manner by contrastive words of animosity and rage. Irony and satire has been holdd which contends with human absurdities. Disparity of opinions and rivalry has been visualized done and by means of the words resembling shoot at will, scandalous, bribes etc. Collapse of friendship and feelings of hostility argon prevalent throughout the text. funds has been tagged as a corrupting factor for both the regimens.Likewise, the issue of predator versus the prey, hunter versus the hunted has been depicted by planting Pakistan as a playground. Moreover the concept of us and them has been portrayed. Certain forbid words have been utilize to show the negligence of Pakistani government through the phrases like now is the time to reconsider our support for Pakistani Government and what will our adversaries desist?etc. Thus both of the articles house up apart from each other. We notice that how the roles of the participant atomic number 18 reversed through the choice of stro ng words. Both the generators have used convincing lexis to support their case. And we as the readers be easily able to draw different connotations through the choice of strong words.NAMING AND REFERENTIAL STRATEGIES-The way people be named in news discourse can have significant intrusion on the way in which they ar viewed.Article one-This article by a Pakistani writer return keys an explicitly projected pungent mood. All the text has been explained as an juiceless commentary castigating the new tourism packages Pakistan has recently offered. In this article America has been named openly as a predator on Pakistani playground. The writer gives America a symbol of a tourist who avails the adventure package and makes it back stand unharmed. Another important naming strategy is the in claim use of You to connote Raymond Davis at an individual level and similarly America as whole, at a more advanced level. Calling America and Davis with the you-perspective takes an ironic atmo sphere- both verbal chaff and irony of situation. The word you in any case dramatize the separated statuses of us and them. Article two-In this article, Pakistan has been awarded words connoting hatred and disrespect. All through the length of the article, the American writer explicitly isolates Pakistan by the use of words like Pakistani Government, Pakistani officials, reliance on Pakistan. Pakistan has been given a simile of a corrupt arrangement. On the contrary India has been mentioned as democratic India showing friendly consignment with her. Davis has besides been called in terms of a national hero through the words like US Official. On another catamenia Davis has been flaunted by an isolated Mr. Davis highlighting his raised and respectful stature for America. Pakistan has also been constantly insulted by ironic remarks as a supposed US ally.Comparison and analysis-The colloquial stance characterized by a simplicity yet directness of diction pervades the two article s. Both articles be crisp and taunting in their expression of hatred and disgust. War-like enmity and lookup themes are re menstruum through the alienation of naming techniques. Pakistan, US and Davis stand clearly and shine independently throughout the textual canvas.PREDICATION-This technique bears similarity with referential strategies. It means linguistically assigning qualities to persons, animals, objects, events, actions and social phenomenon.Article one-The Pakistani newspaper article has a redundant use of predications for example words like not revealed, not disclosed, dont despair, dont worry shows the writers covert stance. as well verbs like targets, accused, and shoots connote war-like imagery. The most significant verbs in this article belong to the theme of treachery and conceit. For example, taking us for a ride over and over and we will be fed various lies, contradictions, pacifications and denials. here(predicate), riding a dangerous joyride and feeding poiso nous contaminated food could be the clandestine analogies the writer wants to make.Article two The American perspective is also full of sarcastic lashings and derogatory remarks about Pakistan. The writer calls Pakistani behavior as insulting. Moreover, Pakistans money dependency on America has been bitterly mentioned again and again so as to buffeting Pakistans greed. For example sending billions of US dollars to Islamabad and paying bribes does zip fastener to help these matters. Another example is pouring money into a corrupt system encourages corruption.Comparison-Verbs of contrastive meanings have been used to highlight negative atmosphere of rage and fury. The collapse of human relationships in the destructiveness of todays racial frustration is a major motif in both the texts.SENTENCE CONTRUCTION SYNTAX AND TRANSIVITYTransitivity describes the relationships between the participants and the roles they play in the fulfiles depict in reporting. According to Simpson, in a ny process at that place are three components that can be changed. These components are the participants, the process and the circumstances. Noun phrase is used for participant, verb phrase for the process and the adverbial and prepositional phrase for the circumstances. The process is move on subdivided into verbal process, mental process, relational process and material process. Material process further includes the transitive actions and intransitive actions. All these points will be explored in both articles.Article one The first article enumerates an indirect depiction of Raymond Davis incident. The audience immediately becomes attuned to the story-like arrangement of the incident in terms of a tourism package. The recurrent themes of the article keep the readers at the process of their seats enjoying every bit of in figure outation the story reveals. In this article, there is a biting sarcasm which forces the readers to feel the brunt of their absurdity as Pakistanis. int erpreted as mere puppets, Pakistanis are the participants along with Raymond Davis, America and Pakistani government. Their roles have been described through the nouns mentioned earlier in the assignment. The whole process is that of current political unrest between the two states. This process further takes on a separate tinge as the two governments try to hide their incentives. This process has been described by the words like grilled fumbled and mumbled. All the four processes have been used.All four kinds of processes are used. The verbal processes include the verbs like, hitting, speaking, working, trying and rejecting etc. Mental processes include the words like accepting. there are different sentences which includes the relational processes, like whats the harm in putting a price to someones life what a fantastic master-stroke it was As far as the material process is bear on it includes the transitive and intransitive action. The transitive action involves the agent and the object of the action while the intransitive involves only one participant. The transitive action is unmixed when the writer states that to know more about the US Drone knockout experience, you will be given access to information The intransitive action is missing in this article.Article two-The process is again the Davis issue. Participants are Davis, American and Pakistani government. India and Afghanistan have also been mentioned. The mental process includes think, reconsider. The material processes are present. The transitive action is represented through the sentence We should take this opportunity to reconsider our support to Pakistani government. Only these processes are present.SENTENCE CONSTRUCTION MODALITYModals are a tool to label and judge. They play a significant part in sentence structure. They are the opposite strategies to transitivity.Article one-In this article modal(a)s have been used. The modal of whitethorn have been used in the sentence Regarding the death s-blood money may need to be pain. Here may is used as a modal for probability. Modal of will in the sentence, Will the US ever contradict over Daviss immunity? has been projected as a modal of future intention and prediction. This stance is showing the writers evaluative stance.Article two This article is redundantly occupied with modals. Sentences like Aid to Pakistan should be halted, the bribe paid for Mr. Daviss release should be subtracted from this months check for Islamabad, Congress should act. Here should have been used as a modal of obligation, necessity and prediction. Modals of can have also been applied. For example From this, Congress can at least(prenominal) mitigate the damage. This modal depicts ability, possibility, and request.Modal of would is exemplified in the sentence, Some would conclude that our largesse for Pakistan buys us access to neighboring Afghanistan. This modal has been applied to show condition, habit and preference.Comparison-Modals have strengt hened the germs stance in both the articles. All the participants are fully embroiled in action and continually leash out negativities. The startling fury and kinky comments predates the articles and alert us to meanings beyond the common core of the words spoken. Where the Pakistani indite embeds her exposition of situation into the flow of the dialogue, the American author echoes his terminology with successive poison-drenched words of accuse and mistrust. Hence, the modal choices are an indication of the attitudes, judgments or the political beliefs of the writer or a speaker.PRESUPPOSITIONPresupposition is the relation between form and function. These are hidden and presupposed meanings in a text. It is an implicit claim hidden in the explicit claim of the text.Article one-The hidden stance in article one is clearly that the release of Davis is not justified. The hidden stance can be expressed through the use of articles, nouns and verbs. In this article, the use of You show s a mocking point of views. The cynicism is directed towards the Pakistani political science to have swallowed the blood money. Verbs like paid, underestimated, and hunting all show the implicitness of war between the two nations. Adjective used for showing the height of irony is fantastic masterstroke to express the mockery of the blood money transaction. Wh-questions are also present like who will pay that-you wonder.Article two-There is hidden or covert stance in this article. Although the author bluntly states his hatred for Pakistan, his stance could be presupposed to some extent. His attitude is direct and cutting. The sharpness of tongue and use of modals defends his political perspective. On go by of that, the author successively throws questions at the government and people to reconsider their mode of action. The presuppositions in this article are triggered by the use of wh-questions For example what will our adversaries conclude?RHETORICAL TROPES-Rhetorical devices are used for persuasion and convincing. It has five sub-catagories.1. magnification-It means excessive exaggeration.Article one Hyperbole is prevalent in the sentences like Pakistan tourism offers a new package which has been tried, tested and prove successful. This extended image of tourism package is a magnification to clarify the image of free trespassing on Pakistani grounds. ulterior this hyperbole has been further explained through descriptive phrases like Adventure package, adventure plan, Pakistan is a playgroundyou can take anything and anyone on a ride. All these words show overelaborated images of Pakistani naivety and vulnerability.Article two-This article is full of exaggerated frustration on part of America. For example the sentences like Assistance from US taxpayers to Pakistan has increased to a sky-high average of $ 1.5 billion per year. The gal of asking for an extra $ 2.3 one thousand thousand payment on top of it is insulting. Here exaggeration is depicted throug h words like sky-high, extra, on top of it. Moreover, sentences like Pakistan is far too corrupt for economic system to work, Pakistan still uses and supports terrorists as tools for national policy. All these accusations are false and are based on misinformation.