History through Oral Interviews Essay

When it comes to stories about the sixties, we receive one family friend that we rely on. Uncle Jim, or simply Jim to my pargonnts, is a guy with a lot of stories about the past. The topic I asked him to share was about the growth of wo workforces lib in the country. According to him, women were treated precise differently back then. Very a couple of(prenominal) women were employed, doing the same job that of a man, with more(prenominal) or less of the females confined in their houses doing household chores. He shared that the growth of feminism at that time came as a desecrate to most of the people back then.Women started abstracted to get recognized, demanding allude opportunities as men. If we verbalism at it in todays perspective, it would be right for women to demand equal treatment, except back then, it was really different. He mentioned that it was quite awkward working with them, but as more and more women started doing mens work, the people got used to it. This p rivate experience account somehow differs from the casebooks treatment. First of all, it is in the flesh(predicate), wherein we have to hear the point of view of Uncle Jim, and that his story whitethorn have biases.The textbook offers a more general view of the topic, while the personal account focused more on a specific aspect, and that is about the personnel of growing feminism in the workplace. spontaneous histories give a more chromatic angle in the story, like how the men felt awkward working with women in some jobs back then. Also, oral histories are more interesting, though may not be that much informative as compared to textbooks. Again, its because of the perspective of person being considered in conveying events and other information.